<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Speed-Flying Forum Tag: aspect ratio - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://forum.speed-flying.com/</link>
<description>Speed-Flying Forum Tag: aspect ratio - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:46:26 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>admin on "High or Low AR ?"</title>
<link>http://forum.speed-flying.com/topic/high-or-low-ar#post-114</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">114@http://forum.speed-flying.com/</guid>
<description><p><em>Submitted by <strong>kitesurfa </strong>on April 10, 2006 - 12:48am</em></p>
<p>When working out what glider or wing is most suitable What is the ideal Aspect Ratio for best flight.</p>
<p>Low Aspect Ratio 2.0 - 3.5<br />
Higher Aspect Ratio 3.5 - 5.0</p>
<p>Aspect Ratio = Span² / Area</p>
<p>Would a Glider of say 10.5m² with a 5.0 AR be usable or would the lift be to much ?</p>
<p>Some thoughts -<br />
If the wing has a higher than average Aspect Ratio would it counter a higher wing loading you get when using a smaller wing, due to the fact that the wing will be generating more lift as it is traveling through the air at speed ?
</p></description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
